"We Haven't Lost it all Yet"

Jul 7, 2009 10:06pm

soy:

stepliana:

Prisoner of Azkaban is not only the best book, but the best movie as well (so far). I long for David Yates to realize that filming two Deathly Hallows movies is going to be too much for him to handle, and to hand over Part 2 to Alfonso Cuaron, who will end the series in a truly epic way. I know it won’t happen, but I can dream.
I both agree and disagree. I still can’t get over the huge plot hole in the PoA film, regarding the production of the major patronus. In the book, the happy memory Harry uses is of winning the Cup, right? But, having not won it in the movie… how did he produce such a powerful patronus in the forest? It’s always bugged me. But in every other way, I agree. :)

I’m not sure if I’m right, but I think that the reason he produced the powerful patronus in the forest is because he had seen himself doing it earlier, which was partially excluded in PoA. But I get your point. A lot of the plot in PoA is different than the book.

stepliana:

Prisoner of Azkaban is not only the best book, but the best movie as well (so far). I long for David Yates to realize that filming two Deathly Hallows movies is going to be too much for him to handle, and to hand over Part 2 to Alfonso Cuaron, who will end the series in a truly epic way. I know it won’t happen, but I can dream.

I both agree and disagree. I still can’t get over the huge plot hole in the PoA film, regarding the production of the major patronus. In the book, the happy memory Harry uses is of winning the Cup, right? But, having not won it in the movie… how did he produce such a powerful patronus in the forest? It’s always bugged me. But in every other way, I agree. :)

I’m not sure if I’m right, but I think that the reason he produced the powerful patronus in the forest is because he had seen himself doing it earlier, which was partially excluded in PoA. But I get your point. A lot of the plot in PoA is different than the book.

Comments (View)

Page 1 of 1